Venezuela 2014

By Shane Cassidy

The purpose of this article is not to support any particular political persuasion nor does it seek to defend the killings of any citizens by the government or the military. All violence and intimidation in all of its guises by any institution contradicts the very principles of a democratic country. The focus of this article instead is an attempt to create a deeper understanding of the current events in Venezuela.

In his seminal text, Folk Devils and Moral Panics, the late sociologist Stanley Cohen talks about how a moral panic can manifest in society;

Societies appear to be subjext, every now and then, to periods of moral panic. A condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and sterotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are manned by editors, bishops, politicians and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or ( more often ) resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and becomes more visible.

Over the last ten days internet forums, news agencies and social media sites have brought our attention to the current social unrest in Venezuela. The events, as presented by the mainstream media would lead the casual observer to believe that huge social and civil unrest is occurring in Venezuela which has been caused directly by Nicolas Maduro and his left wing government. This reaction to the events and panic which has been cultivated by the media has been reckless, uninformed, simplistic and decidedly one-sided. On closer inspection it is apparent however that this is far from the reality of the situation.

Following the outbreak of protests and civil unrest primarily by private university students and forces who oppose the current democratically elected, left-wing, Chavista government, headed by President Nicolas Maduro, the government issued an arrest warrant for the supposed leader of the protests, Harvard educated, Venezuelan politician Leopoldo López.

In a country where the current opposition parties are in disarray due to a collapse of any real leadership, Mr. López, the former mayor of one of Venezuela’s wealthiest districts, Chacao,  a man who was virtually unheard of on an international scale until this last week has been elevated to the status as de facto leader of the opposition and has emerged as an apparent opponent to all things abhorrent in Venezuela. “Our youth have no jobs, no future because of this economic model that has failed,” Mr. López declared this week to his supporters, before continuing: “If they put me in prison, it’ll wake up the people. That’s worthwhile.” On February 18th 2014, in what must surely be viewed as a shrewd political maneuver, he voluntarily handed himself in to be questioned regarding his role in protests which led to the deaths of 3 people and injury to over 100 more on the streets of Caracas. He did this only after first attempting to goad Maduro into arresting him by posting on Twitter ” Do you not have the guts to arrest me?”. It is important to note that he did not hand himself in until he had released a video on the internet declaring his intention and thus making himself a living ‘martyr’ for the current opposition supporters currently occupying some of the streets and whipping up even stronger support for himself. Many news agencies and blogs are attempting to present the current dynamic socio-economic-political situation in simplified terms with utter disregard shown to the complex history of the country.

A common statistic which has been repeated verbatim by practically all the major news agencies is that a major reason for the unrest is the level of homicide rate in the country. Venezuelan Violence Observatory estimates that 24,763 killings occurred in 2013 and this is a staggering statistic. Unfortunately crime is a depressing reality in Venezuela. It has, however, been ignored across all media outlets that Nicolas Maduro has actively sought to reduce these figures by introducing the program Por la Vida y Por la Paz whose primary objective is to reduce criminal homicides and has shown signs that it is being effective.

As a way of illustrating the highly complex socio-economic situation, the figure which has been constantly attached to the murder rate in Venezuela has most certainly risen over the previous decade. The statistics regarding this are undeniable. What the media and commentators have repeatedly failed to mention is that during the same period, unemployment rates, especially among the poor, have been halved from 14.5% to 7.6%. So in a country where unemployment rates are plummeting and homicide rates are increasing a much closer inspection of the fabric of Venezuelan society must be undertaken.

There is definitely violence in Venezuela without doubt but these recent events have been initiated by the violent, Molotov cocktail throwing, in-some-cases-murdering rioters and these current riots have been a concentrated effort by the opposition to destabilize a democratically elected government. The US government or its media i.e CNN etc doesn’t support this current democratically elected government. Strikingly, as of February 21st, the US has yet to release a statement condemning the violence of the oppositions protests or the threat it poses to the democratic ideals it purportedly subscribes too. In its 2014 budget, the US has even set aside $5 million for funding “opposition activities” in Venezuela. In other words, they want a more right-wing, US friendly government installed that ‘plays by the US rules’. In 2002 the US attempted, aided and supported a military coup of Hugo Chavez’s totally democratically elected government in Venezuela only for the Venezuelan people to revolt and the US had to admit defeat. A few years later, in 2004, they attempted an oil embargo in Venezuela to make the government less popular. Again, that failed. Last year, John Kerry initially refused to recognize the election results of this sovereign nation but in the end, in a humiliating U-turn, he had to accept the results of an independent nations elections. Just this week, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay released a statement making it abundantly clear that they support the Venezuelan government so it is clear that although pressure is being applied by the US and the media, Venezuela’s closest neighbors are fully behind the country.

A more incisive question must be asked; Since 1999, in a country where unemployment has been halved, where GDP per capita has risen from $4,105 to $10,801, where poverty has fallen from 23.4% to 8.5% and it must also be mentioned that in 1999, Venezuela’s proven oil reserves stood at $14.4bn but by 2011 that figure had risen to $60bn – who stands to gain from overthrowing this current government and economic system? Certainly not the majority of Venezuelan citizens who represent the poorest and most vulnerable members of society and who have largely benefited from this system.

Mainstream media’s reporting of Venezuela has also sought to overstate the current economic situation in Venezuela. Though an unequal country, this was not the creation of the current or Hugo Chavez’s governments but a far more deeply rooted socio-economic situation created by those vested interests who had maintained control over the media, industry and oil reserves for the decades prior to Hugo Chavez’s election. The Bolivarian Revolution of the last 15 years has been an attempt to more evenly redistribute this disproportionate wealth to more of it’s citizens. The UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean recently declared Venezuela to be now the least unequal country of the region (GINI Coefficient) having reduced inequality by 54%. A fact that mainstream media has conveniently forgotten to mention during these events.

A lot has been made of the protests and unrest and it is paramount that the right to protest and the right to free speech and assembly be respected by the Venezuelan government. It must be stated that the attempts by the executive to conduct the business of the judiciary is deeply troubling and coupled with the recent violent actions and attempts to suppress media which isn’t to the regimes taste indicates a hugely flawed process of government. However a fact, which has been continuously and conveniently overlooked over the last week,  is that Nicolas Maduro and his government have been democratically elected by the majority of the Venezuelan electorate and therefore hold a mandate to carry out their reforms. This, in no way, justifies any and all illegal actions which it may carry out but it is unthinkable that these current protests, which have been directly orchestrated by the opposition parties to create instability, could lead to anything other than an eventual admission of defeat from Leopoldo López. For López, regardless of what develops, he has successfully established himself as the face of the opposition in a country whose government has overcome massive barriers in it’s attempt to create a more fair and equal society. It’s important to ask why a democratically elected, socialist government with 3 times more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia and who aspires to the ideals of Simon Bolivar who has attempted to wrestle power away from the minority, wealthy elites is being portrayed in the generally privately owned, corporate media as a renegade government ?

Advertisements

“9 Queens” and Argentine national identity

By Shane Cassidy 

By the late 1990’s, Argentina had become a country so straddled with debt due to the mistreatment of the economy by so many that went before it that this irrefutably disrupted and permanently altered Argentina’s national identity. National identity is the result of various different external factors such as the sharing of history and tradition with others to national symbols such as flag or anthem. Those who have now lived through and experienced Argentina’s crises have undoubtedly had their national identity altered. Following the end of the ‘Dirty War’ and the emergence of democratic politics in Argentina in the 1980’s, a new national identity has naturally emerged with the heavy weight of history inevitably ingrained in Argentinean psyche. The sight of the mothers of the Plaza de Mayo is enough to remind Argentineans of their dark history and the damages an unregulated, un-checked power can do. With that in mind, Argentina has since gone on to experience a different type of abuse at the hands of their leaders and this time through economic methods. Fabián Bielinsky, through his film ‘9 Queens’, attempts to portray this new society and shared national identity while also showing the affects it has had on a larger scale.

9 Queens focuses on two con men, Juan and Marcos who meet when Marcos comes to Juan’s assistance when a scam goes wrong at a petrol station and convinces him to work with him for the day. Marco is the more experienced of the two who will go to whatever lengths for the con, while Juan appears to be the beginner, an innocent with more noble reasons for pulling tricks and scams. In effect, his elderly father is in prison and he needs to earn enough money to bribe the judge. Ultimately they stumble upon a scam to sell counterfeit stamps to a businessman, Esteban Vidal Gandolfo, who is leaving the country the next day. Over the course of the film a web of intrigue and deceit is woven as all the characters appear to have ulterior motives. The film opens with the scene of a simple yet highly evocative and powerful image. Our protagonist Juan, crafty, smooth and clever cons a simple, hard-working and honest cashier out of money in her till. This is a microcosm for Argentinean society in general. A largely corrupt government taking advantage of decent, hardworking citizens for their own benefit. This scene is replicated many times throughout the film, the waiter in the restaurant, the unsuspecting old lady deceived into believing she is helping her nephew to repair his car, the news kiosk where Marcos gets his newspaper for free, the old lady in the lift. The film is an accurate depiction of the extent of present day Argentine society is. Corruption is closely woven into the fabric of society that it is no longer surprising to hear of those who have swindled the books or attempted to steal for their own gain.

A mentality of self-entitlement pervades the film and throughout we encounter many characters adamant in the belief that they are not only entitled but also deserving in whatever they can get. There exists also a delusionary aspect to their attitudes as, although they are all in one way or another caught up in criminal activity, they all state that they are not personally a thief or a crook. This idea that it is every man for himself and ones only concern is profiting by whatever means necessary. When the two protagonists are sitting in a café, Washington, a petty thief and stolen goods salesman attempts to peddle some of his goods. Juan turns to him eventually and enquires about the possibility of acquiring a gun to which Washington recoils in horror and insists that he is not a crook. The irony in the scene is evident in itself but it highlights the extent to which Argentina’s attitude towards crime and theft has been readjusted. What is clear from the film is that corruption has affected every level of society and even policemen are presented as opportunists looking to earn some more money as is seen in the scene where Marcos pays a police colleague to pretend to arrest him to trick Gandolfo into believing his story about the stamps is legitimate.

The brilliant Ricardo Darín plays the character of ‘Marcos’ and his is a portrayal of man caught up in modern day, corrupt, Argentinean society. He represents the mentality of so many of his fellow Argentineans. He has delusions of grandeur and views himself as above the status of a thief when he remarks to Juan, “¿Se cree que soy un ladrón? Yo no matar a personas. No utilizo una pieza. Nadie puede hacer eso.” He is out for himself, even going so far as to tricking his family out of their inheritance and Marcos doesn’t feel remorse for his actions. He believes that he has seen an opportunity and seized it and that he is deserving of it, he unrepentantly says “Vi una oportunidad y me agarró”. Marcos typifies a disillusioned, disconnected, modern-day citizen. When he meets his sister in her workplace he questions her marital and family status. This is a clear indicator that he does not stay in contact and does not display any interest in the lives of his sister or younger brother ‘Federico’. He also shows his lack of respect for elders and Sandro in particular when Sandro is attempting to explain what happened, Marcos interrupts and says disrespectfully “that’s when you blew your fuse”. Marcos is even willing to prostitute his sister to satisfy his insatiable thirst for money and greed. Even after the supposed act o f sleeping with Gandolfo is completed, Marcos rushes to his sister only to grab the suitcase enquiring about the money and showing absolutely no regard for his sisters well-being.

Marcos appears to care little but for the materialistic and monetary gains. He is clearly void of any admirable traits or scruples and only assists Juan at the beginning of the film as he needs someone to help him perform scams. In one scene he remarks to Juan, “Santos no hay, lo que hay son tarifas diferentes” and then he later remarks to Juan “putos no faltan, lo que faltan son inversores”. These two statements allow an insight into the workings of Marcos’ mind. He is motivated purely by his own profit and interest. It is a combination of his blind greed and inability to care for others which inevitably leads to the downfall of Marcos and this can be equally applied to the Argentine banks and society in general. Bielinsky cleverly juxtaposes Juan against that of Marcos so even though Juan is seen as a trickster, he is one troubled by a conscience and guilt. He is ultimately vindicated in his actions as he is assisting his lover Valeria to regain control of her inheritance. The relationship between the two main characters shows this clash of conscience and values in modern day Argentine society.

“Este país se va al infierno” (Marcos, Nueve Reinas)

By all accounts, the distrust levelled at banks reached a plateau by the turn of the century, most noticeably with the Cacerolazo’s[1], protests which involve the banging of pots and pans and made famous in Argentina. The reference to the banks and financial systems and the impact they have had in Argentina was therefore inevitable especially when Argentina experienced such economic and social turbulence along with massive financial loss at the hands of the banks. Bielinsky references them in several scenes and his reasoning for this is two-fold: firstly he wishes to highlight their recklessness and his second motivation is to present his audience with a deeper understanding of how the situation with the banks could have developed to such a stage. The audience witnesses Gandolfo in his hotel room, engaged in a rigorous debate about the price of shares. It is only with understanding of the impending financial crisis that is clear that he is wishing to quickly offload his shares and save as much money as possible from the inevitable loss and impending run on the banks. In another scene where the stamp expert attempts to extort a percentage of the takings for himself. Juan remarks to Marcos that he is “handing out too much shares”. This latter remark is subtle allusion to the banks and the way in which they banked so senselessly as to leave Argentinean society facing an economic emergency. As of May 2011 approximately two-thirds of Argentinean bank accounts are in short-term deposit accounts with banks also very wary of long term loans[2]. It is a curious that if one of the things that unties national identity is a shared past and similar mentality then a whole psyche of mistrust and suspicion has since developed into national identity in Argentina. Argentinean society is caught in this complex scenario where they are unsure and deeply suspicious of all types of government and understandably so. They have experienced and witnessed at first hand the atrocities performed by the military Junta in the 1970’s and equally they have seen the total financial destruction of their country and the wrecking of their currency by the corrupt elite in a ‘democratic’ government during the 1980’s and 90’s. Naturally and unsurprisingly a deep distrust has developed and it this can be witnessed by the manifestation of the idea of cautiousness towards the banks. The final irony is that Gandolfo pays Marcos and Juan by a cashier’s cheque which is certified by a bank but little do the characters know that this means very little given the country’s economic difficulty.

Bielinsky cleverly disguises the real motives of both characters throughout the film and this naturally leads to a development of mistrust and suspicion on both characters sides but also from the audience. The audience gets a disorientating sense of not knowing exactly what is going on while also experiencing the feeling that they are being duped or conned. This was a reality for Argentine society, especially in the 90’s and early 2000’s where Argentina’s economy and government was awash with corruption and manipulation. At every turn in the film, a new deceit appears to be uncovered and the narrative is constructed in such a way as to prevent the audience from ascertaining who exactly is involved with who. The film’s opening scene involves an act of deceit by Juan and is quickly followed by Marcos deceiving the petrol station employees to aid Juan. Marcos’ life has been a life of fraud and crafty dealing. He has tricked his siblings out of their inheritance and throughout the film he is unaware that everyone he encounters is involved in the ultimate act of misrepresentation in order to regain Valeria’s rightful inheritance. Even when Juan goes to visit his father in prison, his father is not only fooled by his son’s faux-innocence but also the card game which Juan’s father plays while Juan visits him is one of sleight of hand and trickery.

It is also through this use of characters that Bielinski also depicts Argentina in its multicultural, diverse way. Argentina, home to so many immigrants from all over the world is a melting pot of different cultural backgrounds and customs. Although largely Catholic, Argentina is home to the largest Jewish population in South America and this Jewish presence in society is also referred to in the film. Bielinsky himself of Jewish descent, depicts a whole area of Buenos Aries as being a Jewish area simply from the implied manner in which Juan states that his mother is from Entre Ríos, a predominantly Jewish area in Buenos Aries[3]. Bielinsky is attempting to show more than just one face of Argentinean society to his audience and wishes to reflect the vibrant, diverse culture which exists within Argentina. It is also pertinent as it displays and acknowledges the existence of a vibrant Jewish population because, despite Jewish people in Argentina representing only 1% of Argentinean population, 10% of all victims were Jewish during the ‘Dirty War’ from 1976-83[4].

Bielinsky makes clever use of his characters in order to represent Argentine national identity in a new light. Although he depicts his characters as deceitful, suspicious and untrustworthy it is never done to portray Argentineans in a harsh light. On the contrary, it is Argentinean society, reflected through Juan and his hopeful ending which encapsulates the goodness of Argentina and it’s society. However, as in every society, an ill prevails in the form of con artists and thieves, be it on a small level or a large financial institutional level. Argentina has experienced great change over the last 30 years and naturally their psyche and perspective will have been altered.

References

[1] http://www.cacerolazo.com

[3] FALICOV, T, The Cinematic Tango: contemporary Argentine film, Wallflower Press, 2007

[4] http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Terrorism/Argentina_STATUS.html

Bibliography

FALICOV, T, The Cinematic Tango: contemporary Argentine film, Wallflower Press, 2007

REIN, R, Argentine Jews or Jewish Argentines?: essays on ethnicity, identity, and diaspora, Brill, 2010

SHAW, D, Contemporary Latin American cinema: breaking into the global market, Rowman and Littlefield, 2007

Nueve Reinas, 2000, Bielinsky, F, Argentina. Buena Vista International (film)

http://www.cacerolazo.com/

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Terrorism/Argentina_STATUS.html

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2011/0517/1224297118048.html

By Shane Cassidy

Social Movements vs Impunity in Argentina

By Larisa Sioneriu 

aa madres de plaza

In this essay I will discuss the contributions of the social movements in the fight against impunity in Argentina from an anthropological perspective. Bringing justice and reconciliation to a state that knew terror and violence in its most extreme forms is a hard yet compulsory task. For a country like Argentina , left with a vivid trauma after going through genocides, making peace with the past is indispensable in order to embrace the future. However, Argentina, like many other countries, delayed in succeeding to do so. But by delaying justice, it didn’t mean that people had forgotten what happened. The social movements that emerged from the Dirty War and its aftermath played a key role in standing up against the painful silence and imposed impunity. Therefore, I will focus on two of the organizations that managed to carry out a struggle against impunity in Argentina : Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo and the HIJOS.

Argentina’s Dirty War

The last military dictatorship in Argentina (1976-1983) was the most painful period of Argentina, as its politics of terror and fear had repercussions that became endemic in the lives of the Argentinians. Following the coup d’état from 1976, Argentina become target of an oppressive and violent government whose aim was to eliminate all the dissidents and the opposition. However, along with the ones who were politically targeted, many innocent people became victims as well. The military regime, also referred to as ‘The Dirty War’, is famous for its crimes against the citizens : kidnapping, tortures and mass-murders. The officially accepted number of the victims of the regimes is 30.000. The 30.000 desaparecidos left a stain on the country’s memory. The regime met its end after being defeated in the war for the Malvinas Islands. Thus, in 1983 , the regime was replaced by a democratic one led by President Raul Alfonsin.

The country was profoundly affected by the former regime and people asked for justice. Alfonsin created CONADEP, a organization whose goal was to investigate what happened to the desaparecidos during 1976-1983. (Soledad Catoggio 2010:9) The findings of CONADEP were included in the Nunca Mas report which generated the trials of a few of the victimizers of the military dictatorship. The developing of the process in bringing justice seemed promising as some of the leaders of the former regime were imprisoned. However, the President shortly passed to laws that brought impunity to the perpetrators : The Full Stop Law and the Law of Due Obedience. The passing of these two laws left the victims and their families restless. The two laws were voided only years later, in 2001, when a judge sentenced two policemen for the disappearance of a Chilean-Argentinean couple. Following Kirchner’s presidency, Argentina re-opened itself to the search of truth and the quest for justice.

If Argentina’s government failed in many ways and very often to fight against the impunity and to manage to bring justice and reconcile its citizens with the atrocities of the past, the social movements created especially by the families of the desaparecidos prevailed. To mention a few of the organizations who fought against impunity through social movements : Familiares, Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo, Los Hermanos, Las Abuelas, Los E-x-Desaparecidos and the HIJOS.

Nuestros hijos nos parieron’

Hebe de Bonafini’s words, ‘Nuestros hijos nos parieron’ (Kaplan 2004:114), are at the heart of one of the most powerful and meaningful social movement in Argentina and not only : Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo. This non-governmental organization consists of mothers whose children were taken away during the bloody military dictatorship in Argentina. These mothers, whose hearts were ripped off by loss, pain and suffering, marched into a fight against impunity, loading their weapons with inexhaustible and unchallenged resistance. From their desperate wish for finding out what happened to their disappeared children, they gave birth to an organization that became one of the most known symbols of the fight against the genocides of the military dictatorship.

Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo are particular for many reasons. To begin with, they started their peaceful, yet powerful fight against the oppressive regime only a year after its installation. In other words, they fearlessly gave voice to their suffering , unanswered questions and resentments against a regime in power.

The madres met by coincidence in the Ministry of Interior , while they were looking for questions regarding their disappeared children. When they realized that they share the same pain and the same purpose, they decided to meet again. It was on the 30th of April 1977 when the madres had their first march in Plaza de Mayo. On that day, there were 14 mothers attending the march. Since they weren’t allowed to make a public protest, they walked counterclockwise in the Plaza and captured the attention of the few people who were present there. Ever since, the madres have been marching every Thursday at 3:30, managing to ‘transform private and personal grief into collective political action and heroically challenge(d) a military dictatorship.( Gandsman 2012:195).

These marches became more and more numerous and more and more impacting. From only 14 women the number increased to hundreds and inspired other social movements as well. Their most striking symbol was the white scarf they used to hear on their heads during the manifestations. The scarves had written on them the names of their disappeared children. Although not all of them were religious or they came from different religious backgrounds, they used to simulate Christian processions and recall the image of Virgin Mary by covering their heads. As Diane Tylor (1998:102) affirms, ‘The virginal role allowed the women to perform traditionally acceptable “feminine” qualities of self-sacrifice, suffering, irrationality, even as they took one of the most daring steps imaginable in their particular political arena: they affirmed their passivity and powerlessness.’  For there weekly march and their way of expressing themselves through such symbols , they were often referred to as ‘Las Locas’.

The mothers soon started to look for ways to make themselves heard around the country and realized how useful could media be. On the 5th of October , 1977, they took advantage of the Mother’s Day and managed to publish an ad in the popular newspaper ‘La Prensa’. It is believed that they succeeded to get the ad published because one of the mothers was close to some people running the newspaper. (Kaplan 2004:118) The ad consisted of a list of names and identification numbers of 237 mothers of those who had disappeared. They sought more help from the media afterwards and succeeded to make themselves heard internationally in 1978, during the World Cup that took place in Buenos Aires. They continued their weekly march during the World Cup and this brought the attention to international media who interviewed them and published their story internationally. Another way of creating awareness during that period was by writing their stories and the name of their desaparecidos on paper currency.(Kaplan 2004:121)

However, the authorities of that regime didn’t close their eyes in front of their street demonstrations and the activities of ‘Las Locas’. In December 1977, ten people involved in Las madres de Plaza de Mayo were kidnapped. Among them were two of the madres, Esther Ballestrino de Careaga and Maria Eugenia Ponce de Bianco. The women had never returned. Moreover, at the end of 1978, the Plaza de Mayo had been sealed and hence, the mothers had lost their ‘square of fight’. In spite of all these events, the madres were not stopped and they went on with their struggle. Moreover, they continued their street demonstrations even after 1983, when a the military dictatorship was defeated by the democratic elected president, Raul Alfonsin.

In 1986, Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo divided into two groups: La Linea Fundadora and La Asociacion Madres de Plaza de Mayo. The main reasons that led to their separation were the contradictory opinions on attending the hearings of CONADEP and the supporting of the exhumation of the bodies. (Kaplan 2004:145). Some of the mothers didn’t want to ‘identify’ bodies, but to ‘identify the assassins’. (Kaplan 2004:142) In spite of these contradictions between them and the division into two, the madres kept being active in their search of truth and justice. It was only during the Kirchner’s presidency (2003-2007) that the madres stopped their annual march (but not their weekly one). Under Kirchner’s presidency, las madres felt heard and understood for the first time. The culmination of their struggle and national recognition was when President Kirchner claimed: ‘We are the children of the Mothers and Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, and for that reason, we insist on strengthening the system of protection of human rights and the judgment and condemnation of those who violate them’. (Gandsman, 2012:201)

For more than 30 years, the Madres de Plaza de Mayo, stood up and fought against the most fearful regime in Argentina and continued to fight against immunity until nowadays. ‘These ordinary housewives turned themselves into the crack troops of a movement that couches justice in terms of ethics and historical memory.’ (Kaplan 2004:104)

 

La lucha que nos pario’

‘La lucha que nos pario’ is a very common expression used among the HIJOS (Hijos por la Identidad y la Justicia contra el Olvido y el Silencio). The HIJOS are yet another distinctive non governmental organization that brought the fight against impunity on the streets of Buenos Aires. This organization is made of the sons and daughters of the desaparecidos in the military dictatorship.

The HIJOS was created after children of the victims of the former regime attending the commemorative meeting ‘Memory, Remembering and Compromise’ at the University of La Plata, in 1994. The commemorative meeting was organized by the friends of the abducted Carlos de la Riva and managed to gather many children of those who had disappeared during the period of 1976-1983. The gathering brought the children of the victim together and they experienced a sentiment of revelation and comfort since ‘they could share their experiences with others who understood the loss and determination they felt. They could express a variety of emotions and concerns without having to defend their feelings or explain that they wanted justice, not vengeance.’ (Kaplan 2004:155) As a result of this reunion, the ones who attended it decided to meet again the following year. This reunion led to the formation of HIJOS.

During the period in which the HIJOS emerged, Argentina was dealing with unhealed wounds. In spite of now being in an era of transition to democracy and having passed 10 years from the ending of the most painful military dictatorship, the country still didn’t overcome the terror of the former regime. Since justice had not been made, peace was ,for many, a utopia-like desire. The ‘Full stop’ law and the law of ‘Due Obedience’ issued by the President Raul Alfonsin, enabled the victimizers of the military regime to get away unpunished. Even though this law aimed to silence the victims and reconcile the past through forgetfulness, it most certainly didn’t bring peace and justice. Among the ones who wanted justice, HIJOS were one of the first in claiming it and the first to make it.

Making justice in their own way was the most prominent peculiarity of the HIJOS – the justice was made through the escraches. The verb escrachar comes from Lunfardo, an Argentinan dialect that emerged in the late 19th century among the criminals imprisoned in Buenos Aires. However, Lunfardo is now used in the day to day vocabulary in Argentina. Meaning ‘to reveal’ or ‘to unmask’, escrachar is a method of making public the identity of the perpetrators of the 30.000 desaparecidos. ‘Escraches were a communication strategy based on public exposure and humiliation, whose goal was to eliminate or limit the social spaces that repressors have gained.’ (Kaiser 2002:504) .

The escraches are not simply street demonstrations. They are a serious procedure that involves hard work and commitment. The HIJOS act as both detectives and judges. They spend a long time before the day of escrache by doing all the research on the crimes of the ones to be escrachados. Once they tracked down the repressors and gathered all the information about their involvement in terrorizing the country during the military regime, the HIJOS start organizing the day of the escrache. They go to the neighborhood of the genocida and invite the neighbors to the escrache. They talk to them and hand leaflets on which they wrote all the crimes committed by the genocida. They also put on signs with the address of the genocide and paint the walls of the neighborhood with different messages such as : ‘Si no hay justicia, hay escrache’. The day of the escrache is a celebration. They march around the neighbourhood with drums and posters, singing and announcing the neighbours: ‘Alerta, alerta, alerta a los vecinos /Al lado de su casa esta viviendo un asesino’. The neighbours and join them and they march together to the house of the one to be escrachado. Here, the HIJOS give a speech and mark the area with paintings, making sure that his identity is now revealed to the rest of the world. As a consequence, the genocida becomes a prisoner of his own house. Many of them moved away after being escrachados, because they were not able to live in that area the way they used to before. Others are even excluded from other social groups or even work – the case of the gynecologist Jose Luis Magnacco, who was dismissed from the clinic he worked in as a result of being escrachado. (Kaplan 2004:162).

(…) escraches are more than traditional challenge to impunity and political amnesia. Their way of bringing back the past into the public sphere compels society to face specific effects of the failure to administer justice and to define its policy toward the original human rights violations as well as within ongoing struggles for accountability.’ (Kaiser 2002:500)

 

Conclusion

 

To sum up, the local social movements in Argentina were at the core of challenging immunity. The aftermaths of such a bloody military dictatorship couldn’t have been other than a painful transition to democracy, in which the memories still tortured the victims and their families. The search for truth was fundamental for the reconciliation with the past , and the social movements played a great role on the stage of justice. We have seen how Las Madres and Los HIJOS succeeded in creating awareness about the past, giving voice to the victims, making justice on their own and  defeat impunity.

 

 Bibliography :

 

  • Kaiser, S. 2002: Escraches: demonstrations, communication and political memory in post-dictatorial Argentina. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 499-516.
  • Kaplan, T. 2004: Taking back the streets: women, youth, and direct democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press
  • Robben, A.C.G.M. 2010: Testimonies, Truths, and Transitions of Justice in Argentina and Chile. In: Hinton, A.L. (ed.): Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities in the Aftermath of Genocide and Mass Violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press (p. 179-205).
  • Robben, A.C.G.M. 2005: Political Violence and Trauma in Argentina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Soledad Catoggio, Maria 2010: La ultima dictadura militar argentina (1976-1983): la ingeneria del terrorismo de Estado. Online Encyclopedia of Mass Violence , pg 1-20
  • Taylor, Diana , Making a Spectacle : The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. Journal of the association for Research on Mothering, 3:2 , 97-109

By Larisa Sioneriu

Gated communities in Brazil

By Larisa Sioneriu

The fear of violence has driven people to create different ways of protecting themselves from the evils of the world. As time passes, society seems to be more and more terrorized by this fear and people live in a constant state of heightened awareness. Gated communities are one of the ways in which people try to secure their safety. This essay is an introduction to the gated community phenomena that is taking place in Brazil. It is well known that Brazil is a country with a high rate of crime; hence, this palatable fear has taking grip of the people, making them overtly conscience of their safety. Gated communities in Brazil is a topic that interests not only the rich who can afford a safer place to live but across class strata’s and areas in society such as the vulnerable poor, middle and working class families and even the Government, the police, the media, the architects, the anthropologist or anyone who is looking secure some form of safety for themselves and their families. I will talk about the emergence of these communities in Brazil, how they function, the violence that leads people to create a ‘sub’community within an urban setting and its negative effects.

Methodology

 Along with the research from the scholars who have written about the topic I have also interviewed 7 Brazilian people. For privacy reasons I will not use their real name in this text, instead I will refer to them as Diego, Thiago, Bianca, Paolo, Gustavo, Mateus and Eduardo. I will introduce their opinions about topics such as violence and gated communities in Brazil where I think it’s appropriate and relevant. The interviews took place on the internet, through email; I sent them the questions and then they responded. Of those people I have interviewed some are friends and others I’ve contacted through mutual acquaintances. They all agreed to the use of their answers in this essay.

The Gated Communities

A gated community is a residential area where a few middle-class and upper-class families live. These gated communities are usually situated at the periphery of the big cities and can be found all around the world: New York, Los Angeles Cairo, Caracas, Rio de Janeiro, London, Bombay, Dakar, Sao Paolo, Toronto, Mexico City, Sydney and many others. (Low 2001, Kuppinger 2004, Falzon 2004). ‘Gated communities respond to middle-class and upper-middle-class individual’s desire for community and intimacy and facilitate avoidance, separation and surveillance. They bring individual preferences, social forces, and the physical environment together in an architectural reality and cultural metaphor.’ (Low 2001:48) One of the common attributes they have is privacy. Their privacy is secured through different methods: professional CCTV, alarms, security guards, armed security guards, big gates and fences, gate codes and any non-resident of the area is asked to show an identification document.  This indicates that amongst other reasons for living in gated communities, a salient one is the personal security. Large cities are frequently known for the great number of violent acts that they host and this in turn becomes the most significant reason why people chose to live in a better secured place, such as a gated community.  The gated communities have become worldwide phenomena, as they have expanded significantly over the last decade all around the world. (Levy 2010:99)

‘Condominios fechados’ in Brazil

Gated communities in Brazil referred to as ‘condominios fechados’, are being expanded more than ever. The process of urbanization in Brazil, known for its speed, intensity, profundity and quick industrialization led to an imminent modification of the space i.e. the land area. (Arante 2009:2)  Caldeira (1996), who completed valuable research on the topic, shows us how the gated communities emerged in Brazil, particularly in Sao Paolo. According to her, almost a century ago Sao Paolo used to be a centralized city, and the only difference between the rich and the poor is that the former used to live in bigger and more luxurious houses while the second used to live in a small place, shared with many family members. However, the city still functioned on the principles that an urban congregation consists of, such as common use of public space. During the 1940s and the 1980s , Sao Paolo began the process of division; the middle and upper classes used to live in the centre of the city while the poor moved to the periphery. It’s only since the 1980s and 90s that the condominios fechados emerged as a result of the fear of the violence. In the last decades, the number of crimes grew considerably. In Salvador, the first condominios fechados horizontais appeared between the 1970s and the 1980s.  According to Arantes (2009:8), these first gated communities were built for the working class, usually people who worked for the same company moved into these residential areas (owned by the companies, in most cases). The residents of that period of time said that they preferred living in these new gated communities to get away from the city rush, to live in a more relaxed environment and be closer to the nature. Also, most of them were families with small children. It was in the 1990s when the purpose of living in these condominios fechados was the need of a safer place.

In Rio de Janeiro, as well as in the other large cities, the industrialization and the migration from the countryside to the city modified the geography of the city. The suburbs emerged in the 1920s-30s. The favelas were the first suburbs that were developed in Rio de Janeiro ( Hermam :4).  Starting in 1970s, the demand of lodging for middle and upper classes grew quickly and so people turned to the private companies. In this way, the first condominios fechados appeared in Rio de Janeiro. As Levy (2010:97) observes, the space is altered and frontiers are being burnt as a consequence of the globalization of the urban. However, in the past decades, the incidents of moving into a condominio fechado were the consequence of a sense of insecurity. As Rio de Janeiro developed quickly, so did the criminality; it became unsafe to use the public spaces and people started to regain their safety and freedom by moving into these isolated communities.

Living in a gated community forces the public men to reproduce in a private space. (Levy 2010:103) There is a feeling of false community given by these walled spaces. ‘Gates, instead of creating communities are attracting people who prefer privacy and retreat from society’ ( Low 1997: 68) The social segregation is one of the main issues of these gated communities. Living aside this topic for the moment, Caldeira (1996:59) observes how the common characteristics of the condominios fechados involve this concept of segregation. All of these condominios fechados have armed guards and security systems so that they decide admission or exclusion of non-residents; they are designed in a introvert fashion and not towards the roads, they are isolated by big gates or surrounded by empty spaces; and nonetheless, they are private properties for collective use. We also learn from Caldeira(1996) that the condominios fechados suggest a certain status.

 Residents are creating a social distance from the others and separate themselves both consciously and unconsciously from the rest of the inhabitants of the city. ‘Os condominios negam os principios de uma vida urbana democratica.’1 (Levy 2010:105) ‘Residential segregation created by prejudice and social economic disparities is reinforced by planning practices and policing, implemented by businessmen and banks’ (Low 2001:46). What is even more striking is that mainstream media are also encouraging this new life style. There are many commercials and advertising in Brazilian media who aim to attract people in the condominios fechados and they often use ‘security’ and ‘safety’ as tools to sell the product. Some examples of this are the following condominios that are advertised through the utopia of safety : Lago : tranquilidade e vida moderna (tranquility and modern life) ; Freguesia : para voce vicer Feliz da Vida (so that you live a happy life) ; Estancia Ville : voce pode, sua familia merece (you can, your family deserves it) ; Fasol da Ilha: sua vida tambem pode ser perfeita (your life aswell can be perfect) ; Casa Propria : um final feliz para essa novela  (…) com mais seguranca e qualidade de vida (a happy end for that story…with more safety and a better quality of life) ; Alphaville : viver tranquilo ( to live tranquilly). People feel an immense pressure from this both real and manufactured fear and an anxiety for their own safety that they move into these isolated places. Media rumours and true life experiences all contribute to the creation of a culture of fear in these Brazilian cities.

Most of the people I have interviewed have positive opinions about the condominios fechados, even though not all agreed with the idea that it protects you from violence. When asked if they think that living in a gated community is a good solution for the personal safety, most of them said yes. Diego, who used to live in a condominio fechado , agrees that there are more advantages : ‘Não sei se é  realmente uma solução para a segurança pessoal, mas com certeza é uma maneira de se manter mas tranquilo quando se chega à noite, e tem a sensação de que seus familiares e pertences estão a salvo de qualquer mal. Ser vigilado hoje em dia se turnou uma maneira de se sentir seguro, pois há câmeras, pessoas passando o tempo todo e vendo tudo que está acontecedo a sua volta, o que te libera desse ‘fardo’ de sempre estar atento ao entorno.’2  Another interviewee, Tiago , said that even though he didn’t live in a ‘condominio fechado’ he tried to secure his house as much as possible : ‘Some people try other solutions, for example, I used to live in a house with electric fence, electric gate, cameras and two big dogs.’ Bianca, a girl who lives is one of these condominios answered : ‘No, porque si a los atacadores les dieran las ganas de atacar un condominio fechado lo harán como ya lo hicieron miles de veces en Rio y São Paolo. (..) Pienso que los condominios fechados, si son seguros, pero ademas de la seguridad, ofrecen sercivios como transporte, gimnasio, canchas de deporte, piscina, etc’.3 

Even though not everybody agrees that gated communities are the safest option, they all agree that is one way of keeping safe. When asked to mark their fear of violence from 0 to 10 , the results came up like this: Bianca : 10 ; Thiago : 9 ; Diego : 7; Paolo : 3; Mateus : 7 . These are a clear indicator that fear exists among Brazilians at very high rates. But how much of this fear is real and how much is based on contrived ideas or views? Is Brazil’s case of violence based on rumour and media propaganda? Or is it simply the reality they live?

Violence in Brazil

According to the Human Rights Watch 2011 report ‘There are more than 40.000 intentional homicides in Brazil every year. In Rio de Janeiro hundreds of low-income communities are occupied and controlled by drung gangs, who routinely engasge in violent crime and extortion.’ Violence is a vivid culture among Brazilians. They hear about it, they see it and they experience it. Newspapers and TV are showing everyday cases of crimes and violence , but this doesn’t seem to be just media propaganda, it is the sad reality of Brazil’s life. There are outrageous cases of violence in Brazil. Sckolhammer (39) reminds us of how a few years ago, when the Policia Militar entered a favela in Rio de Janeiro, they found a strong violent resistance from the criminals of that area but among them there was also a 14 years old girl who ‘orgulhosamente’4 was pointing the weapon at the police. This case was shocking and it is not singular. In Brazil, violence takes over all citizens. For some, especially the ones from favelas it’s a way of living , and for others, it becomes an obsessive fear. Nobody is privileged not to be a target of violence, regardless the form it takes. In 2011, the judge Patricia Acioli was shot dead and Congressman Marcelo Freixo declared that he will leave Brazil for a period of time due to many death threats he is receiving. (HRW report).

The 7 people I interviewed live in different cities : Rio de Janeiro, Slvador de Bahia, Campina , Barretos, Sorrocaba and Teresina. All of them have been witnesses or victims of violent acts or have been robbed. They shared their stories and one can conclude that violence has strong roots in Brazilian society.

Mateus: ‘Robbers have entered my old house once (that was not a condominio fechado) and have tried several times.’

Gustavo: ‘Eu já foi assaltadoumos 2 vezes na vida.’5

Deigo : ‘Nunca foi abordado por niguem mais ja fui furtado variaz vezes, um dos meus maiores medos é estar por perto quando esses furtos occurem,, pois não sei qual será a minha reação nem a reação do deliquente.’6

Thiago: ‘I don’t remember seeing actual violence in my 19 years of living in Brazil but I was myself a victim on my first day in Europe, in bright light.’

Paolo: ‘Já preseciei um asssalto. E já fui roubado.’7

Eduardo: ‘When I was 12 years old I was playing football on the beach with my friends. I was dark outside and 2 guys on a motorbike passed by and started to insult us. Then my friends shout back at them and the guys took out their guns and shot at us. A bullet passed by my head and only touched it a little bit; nothing happened to me, I was just bleeding a little.’

Bianca: ‘yo ya fui víctima de 2 atracos en 4 meses, uno muy violento tres atracadores con una pistola en mi cara mientras caminaba en la calle un domingo a las 19h30 200 metros de mi casa en un barrio noble de Rio, Barra da Tijuca, y otro en el coche con mi familia, el atracador no enseño la arma, pero hizo como si estuviera con una en los pantalones y nosotros, con miedo, no quisimos mirar a ver si había de hecho una arma o no. (…)Yo soy muy triste de vivir en una ciudad tan linda, tan rica, con tanta oportunidad y no poder caminar tranquila en la calle, tener un miedo constante y sentirme segura solamente en un sitio cerrado y con seguridad. Ni dentro de los autobuses o coches tengo tranquilidad. Pueden llamarme de paranoica, pero es la realidad que vivo, no puedo tener un bueno móvil porque me van atracarme y llevarlo antes que haya acabado de pagar los plazos, o unas gafas guapas, prefiero no tener un coche porque pienso que llama más la atención de los atracadores, no puedo caminar con buena ropa si voy a la universidad porque donde está, en el centro del Rio a lado de la Central do Brasil, es un sitio donde no quieres llamar la atención de nadie. Solo estoy tranquila  y segura 100% en casa y me molesta el miedo que tengo.’8

These testimonies, along with all the media and official reports show that the culture of fear in Brazil is widely spread. Therefore, the condominios fechados seem to be one of the best solutions people can find to escape from the terror, at least whilst they are at home. Pastana (2005: 183) name this gated communities as ‘aquitetura do medo’9. These arquitecturas do medo transform the cities in big walls. The terrorized population chooses to live in fortified housing, decorated with professional alarm systems, cameras, and security men who are armed. People are afraid to use the public spaces and avoid going out at night times. Pastana(2005:185) observes that people chose to do activities indoors even in the weekends. They would rather watch a movie, order a pizza, talk on the phone and spend time on the Internet or play videogames instead of having a social active life in the public sphere of the cities.

Safety, false sentiment of safety and segregation

But how safe are these condominios fechados ?  In reportage of TV Aratu, we are told that according to the Secretaria de Segurança Pública there have been registered a number of 494 assaults in the gated communities in 2010 in Salvador de Bahia. Criminals seem to find ways to enter even these well secured residential areas. They enter the communities under false identities, claiming that they are workers, electricians and so on. Once they are in, they usually succeed in robbing the houses. Many crimes also occur around the gates of this residential areas, when people go home. The condominios fechados are in fact good targets for the thieves as they know that only wealthy people can afford to live in such areas. This is another reason for people to fail to feel secured even at homes. As a consequence, people update their security systems all the time, and if until recently the security man was not necessarily a professional guard, now people hire professional security men, armed and trained to deal with all kind of possible unwanted situations. In the programme Reporter Justiça there was a reportage called Normas de condominios , where people are told how to protect themselves better in the gated communities and we also find that there actually exists a faculty in Brazil that created a module that aims to teach people how to secure the gated communities and how become good managements of them. The condiminios fechados are a popular topic in Brazil’s media.

Another issue with the security of these residential areas is that even if the gated communities can restrain criminals to break in, people are still exposed to possible assaults when they leave their homes. As much as they try to avoid public spaces, they have to go to work or school and cannot build a whole gated world for themselves. The gated communities do not have a social diversity. The residents are living in a homogenised social group, with same socio-economic profile and the same phobia: violence.

Fernandez (2005:2) concludes that this segregation of citizens in a city leads to the destruction of the city. If people don’t participate actively in the social urban life, this can alter significantly the meaning of being a citizen. Pastana (2005:188) argues that : ‘seja como for, esses enclaves representam um espaço  que contradiz direitamente os ideas de heterogenidade, acessibilidade e igualdade que ajutaram a organizar tanto o espaço público moderno quanto as modernas democracias.’10  The question of a social segregation if very important in Brazil’s context. On one hand, we had the favelas, filled with very poor people, criminals and drug dealers, and on the other side we have the condominios fechados , occupied by middle and upper class. The public spaces are being avoided more and more often and so the question of a division of the Brazilian cities in the future is imminent. It is probably a simplistic view, but big cities in Brazil have created salient extremes and these are important factors of the segregation of the society.

People often disagree with this Brazilian urban paradox, and blame the ones who contribute to it. But there is no doubt that citizens are victims of the violence and they can’t seem to find any other option than moving in walled areas. There is a famous song called Minha Alma , song of the Brazilian band ‘O Rappa’, that sings about the situation of the condominios fechados, blame them for contributing to the segregation, but also raises a very important question : how can one , in search of the protection and freedom, isolate himself in a prison ?

As grandes do condominio/ São prá trazer proteção/ Mas também trazem a dúvida/ Se é vocé que tá nessa prisão.’11

When the victim becomes victimizer

The problem of segregation is not the only negative effect of the condominios fechados. Damaging the environment, creating discrimination, illegally occupation of public spaces in order to build new gated communities- hence violation of federal law , violation of human rights and the right of free movement and corruption are all negative consequences of the condominios fechados.

The illegal gated communities also referred to as falsos condominios fechados are not a problem of the current period of time. They have been constructed decades ago. Higashi (2011: 111) explains how the illegal occupation of public properties emerged in São Paolo. According to him, they have appeared in the 80s, when the city became overcrowded and there was no more space to host so many people. Therefore, new districts have been constructed , and some of them have been legalized. However, not all of them. Even though people blame the poor who have illegally occupied some public areas, the reality is that the condominios fechados are no exception. What makes the favelas different from the condominios fechados is that the last ones isolate the area and transform the public space into a private land. Dr Cristina Moles tells us in a documentary called Prejudice and Greed: Gated Communities- Brazil’, that the Constitution of Brazil prohibits the ownership of any public land. However, the condominios fechados , once they are built, they also set up security measurements against crimes. One of them is the installation of checkpoints and security guards who don’t allow any ‘suspect’ to walk in. Thus, these condominios fechados, apart from being built informal or illegally, also generate more violation of laws. People are not given permission to walk on a land that is public , thus, is for everybody’s use. Dr Cristina Moles also explains to us how this is possible. Once a developer buys an ‘empty land’ he asks the prefecture to provide with infrastructure and street lights. Consequently, he also asks for permission to put checkpoints at the main entrance, under the pretext of security. From then on, the residents take over the land and make their own rules. The State doesn’t intervene because it’s convenient to have less responsibility. And moreover, since corruption is still a great problem in Brazil’s society, the rich can usually make their way. As Lima (2009:6) says : ‘A ilegalidade não é privilegio das clases baixas, também os ricos a produzem’.12

In the documentary mentioned above, we find how people are being discriminated and forbidden to use the public beach. One of the victims, a fish men, tells how affected his life has been since the condominios from his area were built. Since he is a fishmen, he makes a living from fishing and so he is able to provide for him and his family. But the security guards of those condominios don’t allow him to pass through to get to the beach. The problem here is clear: the victims become victimizers and violate the law of free movement and human rights.

Environment is another victim of the condominios fechados. An illustration of this would be another example given in the documentary ‘Prejudice and Greed:Gated Communities-Brazil’. In one of the condominios, the president of the neighbourhood association of housing subdivision interdicts the garbage truck to enter the area. Therefore, the solution they found was creating a new collecting point, outside the condominio. As a consequence, the pollution of the garbage accumulated there from 65 families, damages the surrounding area.

All these violations are the result of the self-segregation that these condominios fechados produce. If at first the inhabitants of the condominios fechados were victims of the violent Brazilian society, one can observe how in some cases the roles are changing and they are the ones who generate social, economic and environmental issues. It is a vicious circle that only causes more alteration to the society of Brazil, and one can even argue that there is a civil war between the rich and the poor.

Conclusion

The culture of fear exist in all big cities and one of its consequences are the construction of the isolated residential areas , that are the gated communities. Middle and upper class people move to the periphery of the cities in search of a safer place. The gated communities are very well secured through different way. In the case of Brazil , the gated communities are more and more popular. Being a country with one of the highest rates of crimes, society is infected with the fear of violence. Thus, those who can afford, move in the condominios fechados and try to protect themselves as much as possible from the crimes. Since violence is a reality in the Brazilian society, we cannot say that the terror of fear is generated from imaginary situations or paranoia. However, we have seen that the condominios fechados are not as safe and nevertheless they are not a solution for the violence. Instead, it creates more violence through self-segregation, violation of laws, discrimination and damaging the environment. Big cities in Brazil have become, as Caldeira (1996) names them , ‘Cidade de Muros’.13

Reference

  1. The gated communities deny the principles of a democratic urban life
  1. I don’t know if it’s a solution for the personal safety but it is certainly a way of feeling safer when you come home at night, you have the sensation that your family are protected from any bad things. Vigilance became nowadays a way of feeling safe since there are CCTV , people watching all the time what is happening on their surroundings, which makes you liberate yourself from that worry of always being aware.
  1. No, because if the robbers want to they will find a way, just how they did it millions of times in Rio and Sao Paolo,(…) I think that the gated communities are safe , but apart from that they also provide services such as transport, gym, swimming pools.
  1. 4.Proudly
  1. I have already been attacked twice in my life
  1. I have never been approached by anyone but I have been robbed a few times. One of my biggest fears is to be around an attack, I don’t know how I’d react or how the criminals would react.
  1. I have already been a victim of an attack. I was robbed.
  1. I was victim of 2 attacks in 4 months, one of them very violent with 3 attackers having a gun pointed to my head, while I was walking on the street on a Sunday at 19:30 , 200 meters away from my house which is in a nice district of Rio, Barr da Tjuca. The other attack happened when I ws in the car with my family and even though the attackers didn’t show their weapon they were acting as if they had one, and we were so terrified that we didn’t even want to see if he had one or not.(…) I am very upset because I live in such a beautiful city, so rich and with so many opportunities and I am not even able to walk on the streets without having a constant fear and only feeling safe in a closed place with security systems. I don’t even feel safe in buses or cars. You can call me paranoid but is the reality I live in. I can’t have a nice mobile phone because they’ll attack me and take , or I can’t have some nice sun glasses, I prefer not to have a car because I think it will draw the attention of the attackers, I can’t wear good clothes if I go to college because my college s situated in the centre of Rio, next to the Central do Brasil, a place where you don’t want to draw the attention to anybody. I am only 100% safe if I am at home and it really bothers me being so afraid.
  1. Architectures of fear
  1. No matter how you put it, these gated communities represent a space that contradicts directly the ideas of heterogeneous-ness, accessibility and equality that help organizing both the public spaces and the modern democracies.
  1. The iron grating around the condominios serve to bring protection , but it also bring a question : is it not you who is in a prison?
  1. Illegalities are not only the privilege of the poor but also the rich are abusing of them.

13. City of Walls

 

Bibliography

  • Arantes, Rafael de Aguiar 2009 Qualidade de Vida ou Fortificações: o significado dos condomínios fechados em Salvador. Revista VeraCidade – Ano IV – Nº 4  pg 1-12
  • Bogus , Lucia Maria Machado ; Pasternak , Suzana 2004 A cidaded do extremos, XIV Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais, pg 2-29
  • Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio

1996 Enclaves Fortificados : a Nova Segregação Urbana. Public Culture, 8(2), 1996: 303-328

  • Dornelles. João Ricardo 2006 O desafio da violência, a questão democráticae os direitos humanos no Brasil. Direito, Estado e Sociedade 9 (29) : 213 a 221
  • Fernandez, Fernando Lannes 2005  Os discursos sobre as favelas e os limites ao direito à cidade.  Published in Cidades (Presidente Prudente: Grupo de Estudos Urbanos, 2(3): 37-62
  • Falzon, Mark Anthony  2004 Paragons of Lifestyle:gated communities and the politics of space in Bombay. City & Society,16( 2) :145–167
  • Grant, Jill 2005 The Function of the Gates: The Social Construction of Security in Gated Developments. The Town Planning Review,  76 (3): 291-313
  • Hermann, Carla Guimarães ‘Breve discussão acerca do uso do espaço urbano: a dicotomização público x privado e a problemática da autosegregação nas metrópoles brasileiras através dos condomínios exclusivos e dos shopping centers.’ The text was elaborated in the “Desenvolvimento Urbano e Planejamento Urbano Crítico”, ministrated by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia da UFRJ by Prof. Dr. Marcelo Lopes de Souza
  • Higashi , Marcio Santiago 2011 Occupação Irregular e Criminalidade na Região da Serra da Cantareira . Revista do Laboratório deEstudos da Violência da UNESP/Marília, Edition 8 , pg 107-15.
  • Kuppinger, Petra 2010 Os condomínios residenciais fechados e a reconceitualização do exercício da cidadania nos espaços urbanos. 7: 95-108
  • Levy, Dan Rodriguez 2010 Os condomínios residenciais fechados e a reconceitualização do exercício da cidadania nos espaços urbanos. 7: 95-108
  • Lima, Daniela Batista 2009 Do Medo a Violéncia á ‘Condominirização’ das Cidades Brasileiras. XIII Encontro da Asociação Nacional de Pos-Graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional, Brasilia. Pp 1-21
  • Low, M. Setha 2001 The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. American Anthropologist, 103( 1): 45-58
  • Low, M. Setha 2010 Claiming Space for an Engaged Anthropology: Spatial Inequality and Social Exclusion. American Anthropologist, 113( 30): 389–407
  • Low, M. Setha 2009 Maintaining Whiteness : The Fear of Others and Niceness. Transforming Anthropology,  17( 2)  79–92
  • Pastana, Debora Regina 2005 Cultura do medo e democracia: um pradoxo brasileiro. Revista Medições Londrina, 10(2): 183-198
  • Schollhammer, Karl Erik 2007 “Breve mapeamento das relações entre violência e cultura no Brasil contemporâneo”.  Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea, nº. 29. pp. 27-53.

Online Resources

•           Fronteira Urbana – Condomínios Horizontais

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBYFN7LU3eQ, Accessed on 14.01.2013

•     Human Right Watch, World Report 2011 : Brazil

http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2011/brazil , Accessed on 18.01.2013

•           Insegurança nos condomínios fechados

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xDNcrQ0pik , Accessed on 14.01.2013

•           Moradores de condomínios trocam porteiros por vigilantes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w56GCz7psGc    Accessed on 14.01.2013

•  Por que morar em condomínio fechado?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQEcX614YWo, Accessed on 14.01.2013

•           Prejudice and Greed: Gated Communities – Brazil.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXqP_iR3gkc , Accessed on 14.01.2013

•           Repórter Justiça – Normas de condomínio (14/04/12)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lExUWyrtcg0, Accessed on 14.01.2013

By Larisa Sioneriu